For citiation reasons, i will removed the article. i can't cited it because it was found from school online resource. Just to play safe, i had removed it. Though some said with the author's name accompanied with the article it should be fine, but let's not risk it.
By the way thanks for mentioning yieyeng. But i'm not ingoring it, all i have was the title and the author's name. Neither it is cited when i got this article, thus i had decided to remove it since the citing information isn't enough.
IMHO, abortion is the taking of an innocent life, and the justification for it is, what would actually give a good enough reason to take an innocent life?
ReplyDeletesaying for example the mother is unable to support the child in the future...etc would abortion then be justified?
or lets change it to say, a rape victim. unwillingly bringing a child, nay, an innocent life into the world. would the power of choice of the woman conceiving it overpower the moral compass of taking an innocent life?
i feel strongly that either way.. an abortion is somethig strongly to be regarded as the taking of life, irregardless of the reasons leading to the pregnancy. but for the sake of the mental and emotional wellbeing of the woman, freedom of choice whether or not give the unborn child a chance, it should be in such cases then made legal.
besides, if abortion was to be banned. people would still find a way to do so with underground means like what happened in sg in the 1970s when it was banned and there was a huge social stigma attached. women actually did illegal abortions with underground inexperienced abortion clinics and many of which damaged their wombs, or wound up infecting them or killing them.
yea, i agreed about the freedom and banning it too. :)
ReplyDelete